Change the Context, Change the Bias

A fork in the road in the forest. Public domain.


I recently attended a lecture by Dr. Keith Payne, a Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of North Carolina, who is changing the way we understand implicit bias — how it forms, how it operates, and how it functions within particular contexts.

We often think implicit bias works like this: When we are young, we absorb stereotypes and beliefs about race and ethnicity that begin to operate at a subconscious level. Unless we bring them to consciousness and challenge them, we assume they’ll stay fixed, deeply embedded in us.

But Dr. Payne’s research reveals something unique. It turns out that the context, the place, and the setting we’re in have a much bigger impact on the development and expression of implicit bias than we realize. For example, if someone takes an implicit bias test twice in the span of a couple of weeks, we might expect their results to stay roughly the same, right? Surprisingly, they don’t. The results can vary, sometimes quite widely.

However, while individual scores fluctuate, the collective score of a given place —say, a county— tends to stay remarkably constant. What’s even more telling is that the average implicit bias score of a county is highly correlated with levels of socioeconomic inequality, stratification, and segregation between racial and ethnic groups within that place. The context, the structures, and the markers of socioeconomic status and race shape implicit bias collectively.

This research offers a powerful insight: Implicit bias isn’t just an individual phenomenon. It’s a collective one, influenced deeply by our environment. And this brings us to an important takeaway. Implicit bias is not fixed, nor is it solely an individual problem. It’s shaped by systems, histories, and the settings we occupy.

This means that the work of changing implicit bias involves tackling systemic barriers and inequalities, but it also offers a profound opportunity. By making intentional changes in our contexts, we can reduce implicit bias.

When we change the context — by increasing diverse representation in leadership roles, creating more opportunities for voices from underrepresented groups to be heard, and actively working toward equity in our spaces — we’re not only working toward righting past wrongs. We’re actively reshaping the context that influences how implicit bias forms and expresses itself.

Increasing diverse representation is a matter of justice. And this fundamentally changes contexts. When people of different racial and ethnic backgrounds are visible in leadership, in decision-making, and in day-to-day interactions, it transforms the environment. And when the environment is changed, we reduce implicit bias, not just at an individual level, but collectively.

Change the context, change the bias.

Renee Roederer

Mental Health Monday: Attachment Styles (Part 2)

Last Monday, we initiated a series on attachment styles. I want to continue that today and also next week. If you missed last week’s post, I’d love for you to start there. You can learn, what are attachment styles? And how do they impact our internal feelings and relationships?

To recap a little, there are four primary attachment styles. There is the secure attachment style, and three insecure attachment styles — 1) anxious preoccupied, 2) fearful avoidant (also sometimes called disorganized or anxious-avoidant), and 3) dismissive avoidant. There is a great deal of psychological research around these, first championed by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, and a lot of interest in recent years.

Attachment styles develop very early in life from ages 0-2. It may be hard to believe that experiences in our youngest years can impact our experiences in adulthood on such a deep level, but if we think about it, we do learn in this period how to trust (or not), how to self-sooth (or not), and what we can expect from others (or not), and since our bodies hold these patterns, it’s not surprising that these imprints would continue to impact us at the subconscious level until we make them conscious and work to heal them.

And we can all work to heal them. We can do work to move toward a secure attachment style.

Today, I’ll invite us to learn again from Thais Gibson, a therapist who has done tremendous work in these areas: